|Year : 2016 | Volume
| Issue : 5 | Page : 565-568
Desquamative gingivitis mimicking mild gingivitis
Shravanthi Raghav Yajamanya, Praveen Jayaram, Anirban Chatterjee
Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, The Oxford Dental College, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
|Date of Submission||28-Jun-2016|
|Date of Acceptance||22-Oct-2016|
|Date of Web Publication||17-Oct-2017|
Shravanthi Raghav Yajamanya
Department of Periodontics and Oral Implantology, The Oxford Dental College, Bengaluru - 560 068, Karnataka
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
The aim of this report is to diagnose the cause for episodic, shifting type of mild inflammation in the isolated areas of gingiva noted by the patient for 1 year. A 33-year-old female patient presented with a chief complaint of mild pain and occasional burning sensation confined to the gingiva to the Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology. Clinical presentation of the gingiva was seen to mimic mild form of gingivitis for 1 year, with no noted systemic involvement gingival biopsy was performed. The presence of Tzanck cell was noted along with intraepithelial split pointing toward pemphigus. Thus, the study concludes that thorough and meticulous gingival examination can reveal the picture of underlying systemic alterations and is the key for early diagnosis and prompt treatment.
Keywords: Desquamative gingivitis, gingivitis, intraepithelial split, pemphigus, Tzanck cell
|How to cite this article:|
Yajamanya SR, Jayaram P, Chatterjee A. Desquamative gingivitis mimicking mild gingivitis. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2016;20:565-8
| Introduction|| |
Desquamative gingivitis (DG) is a descriptive term for nonspecific gingival manifestation associated with different diseases. Different types of mucocutaneous disorders represent gingival manifestations as either desquamative lesions or in the form of gingival ulceration. The most important diseases are: Lichen planus, pemphigoid, pemphigus, erythema multiforme as well as allergic stomatitis and psoriasis vulgaris.
The standard in making a clinical diagnosis of DG: Erythema of gingiva not caused by dental plaque, desquamation of gingiva, other intraoral and sometimes extraoral lesions, and mouth soreness due to spicy food items.
Pemphigus, named by Wichman in 1791, is a group of chronic bulbous diseases. The term pemphigus once included most bulbous skin eruptions, but with the advent of sophisticated diagnostic tests, bulbous diseases have been reclassified. Pemphigus characterized by blisters found intradermally when seen histologically and immunologically by finding the presence of IgG antibody in circulation and directed against the cell surface of keratinocytes is clinically includes a group of autoimmune diseases resulting in blister formation of the skin and mucous membranes.
Pemphigus vulgaris, pemphigus foliaceus, and paraneoplastic pemphigus are the three main subtypes. 70% of pemphigus cases are that of pemphigus vulgaris approximately.
Pemphigus vulgaris first affects the mucous membranes a couple of months before the appearance of cutaneous lesions. Clinically, pemphigus vulgaris shows the presence of typical bullae and ulcers on the skin. However, manifestations of oral mucosa are less characteristic, typically seen as multiple, erosions of the mucosa being chronic in nature or superficial ulcers of varying sizes and most of the times the bullae being ruptured. Hence, oral pemphigus vulgaris could result in longer diagnostic and treatment delays than cutaneous pemphigus, due to unfamiliar features, thus the treatment response and prognosis being adversely affected.
This article describes the case of a patient with gingival presentation mimicking mild gingivitis which eventually was diagnosed as pemphigus vulgaris.
| Case Report|| |
A 33-year-old female patient presented with a chief complaint of mild pain and occasional burning sensation confined to the gingiva to the Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology. However, further investigation regarding the nature of the gingival presentation, patient stated that she has been experiencing episodic, shifting kind of gingival lesions for 1 year. From a general dentist, the patient had initially received supragingival scaling and tooth brushing instructions and was advised the use of ulcer relieving gel (Dologel); the patient, however, noted no improvement in the gingival presentation in spite of repeated phase I therapy.
Oral examination revealed mild to moderate inflammation of marginal gingiva and interdental papilla of teeth number 45 and 46. The presence of Nikolsky's sign was noted (i.e., the gingival surface when slightly scratched, the epithelium could be peeled away easily [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]). She had no lesions on the skin or the extraoral sites and her medical history showed no relevant findings. Pemphigus vulgaris, gingivitis, and erosive lichen planus were considered as the differential diagnosis.
On her second appointment, gingival biopsy was obtained from the advancing edge of the lesion of tooth number 45, [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7], [Figure 8] where areas of characteristic intraepithelial split may be observed by the pathologist [Figure 9]. On her third appointment (i.e. after 1 week), the gingival biopsy site showed a progressive eventful healing but her gingiva presented with an additional lesion of mild nature on tooth number 35 [Figure 10]. After her biopsy results were obtained, the patient was advised to use a synthetic corticosteroid, Kenacort in the form of oral ointment.
|Figure 4: Areas showing desquamative gingival lesions in relation to teeth numbers 45 and 46|
Click here to view
|Figure 6: Clinical view of tooth number 45, the site of gingival tissue excision|
Click here to view
|Figure 10: One-week postoperative healing of gingiva in relation to tooth number 45|
Click here to view
On her fourth appointment (i.e., after 2 months), her gingiva presented with reduced gingival inflammation at initial involved sites [Figure 11], [Figure 12], [Figure 13]. However, at 4-month recall visit, a lesion of mild nature involving only the gingival margin in relation to tooth number 15 was noted [Figure 14].
|Figure 14: Area showing desquamative gingival lesion in relation to tooth number 15|
Click here to view
| Results|| |
On histopathological examination, parakeratinized stratified squamous epithelium with intraepithelial split and Tzanck cells were noted and connective tissue was fibrous with diffuse chronic inflammatory infiltrate. The clinical and histopathological findings helped us diagnose the case as pemphigus vulgaris.
In this patient, 1 year had elapsed from the onset of the oral lesions to the definitive diagnosis of pemphigus vulgaris which, however, took only 2 weeks from her first visit to Periodontology and Oral Implantology Department of the Oxford Dental College and Hospital.
| Discussion|| |
Of all the cases of DG, mucous membrane pemphigoid (48.9%) and erosive lichen planus (23.6%) are the most frequent ones. Pemphigus vulgaris is only 2.3% of DG (2.3%). The definitive diagnosis of DG is based on histopathological examination and direct immunofluorescence testing.,,,,
For the definitive diagnosis of PV, the presence of the following features is a must which are: Presence of appropriate clinical lesion or lesions, biopsy specimens showing acantholysis, and presence of autoantibodies in either tissue or serum or both.
Diagnosis as pemphigus vulgaris of this case was made keeping in mind the following findings: Intraepithelial split and Tzanck cell in histological examination of gingival biopsy specimens, tombstone appearance, burning sensation in gingiva on eating spicy food, Nikolsky's sign, positive response to the use of topical corticosteroid (Kenacort).
Direct immunofluorescence could not be performed in this case as the gingival lesion was too small.
| Conclusion|| |
The highlighting feature of this case was that mild presentation of the gingival lesions resulted in misdiagnosis of the case as gingivitis for 1 year by quite a few dentists. Thus, this case report tries to draw attention toward the two most important aspects of diagnosis–meticulous oral examination and thorough recording of patient's chief complaint.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Popova C, Doseva V, Kotsilkov K. Desquamative gingivitis as a symptom of different mucocutaneous disorders. J IMAB 2007;13:31-3.
Nisengard RJ, Levine RA. Diagnosis and management of desquamative gingivitis. Periodontal Insights 1995;2:4-10.
Rajendran R. Diseases of skin. In: Rajendran R, Sivapathasundharam B, editors. Shafers's Textbook of Oral Pathology. 5th
ed. Delhi: Elsevier; 2006. p. 1099-62.
Sirois DA, Fatahzadeh M, Roth R, Ettlin D. Diagnostic patterns and delays in pemphigus vulgaris: Experience with 99 patients. Arch Dermatol 2000;136:1569-70.
Nisengard RJ, Rogers RS 3rd
. The treatment of desquamative gingival lesions. J Periodontol 1987;58:167-72.
Endo H, Rees TD, Hallmon WW, Kuyama K, Nakadai M, Kato T, et al.
Disease progression from mucosal to mucocutaneous involvement in a patient with desquamative gingivitis associated with pemphigus vulgaris. J Periodontol 2008;79:369-75.
Endo H, Rees TD, Matsue M, Kuyama K, Nakadai M, Yamamoto H. Early detection and successful management of oral pemphigus vulgaris: A case report. J Periodontol 2005;76:154-60.
Lo Russo L, Fedele S, Guiglia R, Ciavarella D, Lo Muzio L, Gallo P, et al.
Diagnostic pathways and clinical significance of desquamative gingivitis. J Periodontol 2008;79:4-24.
Endo H, Rees TD, Sisilia F. Atypical gingival manifestations that mimic mucocutaneous diseases in a patient with contact stomatitis caused by toothpaste. JIACD 2010;2:101-6.
Mimouni D, Nousari CH, Cummins DL, Kouba DJ, David M, Anhalt GJ. Differences and similarities among expert opinions on the diagnosis and treatment of pemphigus vulgaris. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003;49:1059-62.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7], [Figure 8], [Figure 9], [Figure 10], [Figure 11], [Figure 12], [Figure 13], [Figure 14]
|This article has been cited by|
||Idiopathic desquamative gingivitis
| ||ZuhairM Alkahtani, Rajeev Arunachalam, RanjeetAjit Bapat, Arthiie Thangavelu, AnbuselvanGobichettipalayam Jegatheeswaran |
| ||Journal of Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences. 2021; 13(5): 865 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Antibacterial effects of platelet-rich fibrin produced by horizontal centrifugation
| ||Mengge Feng, Yulan Wang, Peng Zhang, Qin Zhao, Shimin Yu, Kailun Shen, Richard J. Miron, Yufeng Zhang |
| ||International Journal of Oral Science. 2020; 12(1) |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Combination of an allogenic and a xenogenic bone substitute material with injectable platelet-rich fibrin – A comparative in vitro study
| ||Solomiya Kyyak, Sebastian Blatt, Andreas Pabst, Daniel Thiem, Bilal Al-Nawas, Peer W Kämmerer |
| ||Journal of Biomaterials Applications. 2020; 35(1): 83 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|