Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology
Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology
Home | About JISP | Search | Accepted articles | Online Early | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | SubmissionSubscribeLogin 
Users Online: 556  Home Print this page Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font sizeWide layoutNarrow layoutFull screen layout
 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Ahead of Print

Public awareness, knowledge, attitude and acceptance of dental implants as a treatment modality among patients visiting SDM college of dental sciences and hospital, Dharwad


1 Department of Periodontics, S. D. M. College of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Dharwad, Karnataka, India
2 Department of Oral Implantology, S. D. M. College of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Dharwad, Karnataka, India
3 Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, S. D. M. College of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Dharwad, Karnataka, India

Correspondence Address:
Pragathi Raghavendra Bhat,
Department of Periodontics, S. D. M. College of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Sattur, Dharwad - 580 009, Karnataka
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_281_18

Background: The use of dental implants as a prosthetic treatment modality for partially edentulous or completely edentulous patients is increased more commonly ever since the concept of osseointegration has been accepted. Objective: The objective of this study is to assess the awareness, knowledge, attitude, and acceptance of dental implants as a treatment modality among patients visiting SDM Dental College, Dharwad. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 500 patients visiting SDM College of Dental Sciences and Hospital (SDMCDSH), Dharwad, using a self-explanatory questionnaire. Results: A total of 500 individuals participated in the survey. The results of this survey indicate that 93.4% of the patients knew about dental implants, and for majority of them, the major source of information was through their dentist followed by relatives and friends and electronic media. About 60.4% patients disapproved the removable prosthesis as an option for the replacement of missing teeth. 77.2% patients expressed that they could not afford for the dental implant treatment. The major deterioration for this treatment was related to the cost in 80.4% patients, surgical procedure in 11.6% patients, and a long treatment time in 5.6% patients. While 60.4% patients felt that dental implants being expensive, is the treatment option only for the rich. Conclusion: The results of this survey showed that majority of the patients visiting SDMCDSH, Dharwad, were aware about dental implants as a treatment modality for the replacement of missing teeth. Although the attitude was positive and they did accept dental implants as a treatment option, the treatment cost mainly was the major reason to take a back step.


Print this article
Search
 Back
 
  Search Pubmed for
 
    -  Siddique EA
    -  Bhat PR
    -  Kulkarni SS
    -  Trasad VA
    -  Thakur SL
 Citation Manager
 Article Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed29    
    PDF Downloaded1    

Recommend this journal