Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology
Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology
Home | About JISP | Search | Accepted articles | Online Early | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | SubmissionSubscribeLogin 
Users Online: 257  Home Print this page Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font sizeWide layoutNarrow layoutFull screen layout


 
   Table of Contents    
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 24  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 264-270  

Prevalence of periodontitis and its correlates among tribal population of Attapady block, Palakkad District, Kerala


1 Department of Periodontics Government Dental College, Affiliated to Kerala University of Health Sciences, Kozhikode, India
2 School of Health Policy Planning Studies, Kerala University of Health Sciences, Trivandrum, India
3 Kerala Social Security Mission, Malappuram, Government of Kerala, India

Date of Submission20-Apr-2019
Date of Decision28-Oct-2019
Date of Acceptance28-Nov-2019
Date of Web Publication04-May-2020

Correspondence Address:
Rosamma Joseph Vadakkekuttical
Department of Periodontics, Government Dental College, Medical College P.O, Kozhikode, Kerala
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_248_19

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 


Background: Periodontal disease is an immunoinflammatory disease characterized by loss of clinical attachment with subsequent tooth loss. It includes periodontitis and gingivitis. The studies regarding the prevalence of periodontitis among the tribal populations are scarce. The periodontal health status of the tribal population of Attapady has not been reported so far. Objective: The present study was conducted to assess the prevalence of periodontitis and its association with oral hygiene habits, tobacco usage, and oral health beliefs among tribal population of Attapady. Materials and Methods: This population-based cross-sectional survey of periodontal disease consisting of 360 individuals was conducted among the tribal population of three different panchayats of Attapady. A multistage stratified random sampling was used in the selection of hamlets and cluster sampling for selection of study participants. The sociodemographic characteristics, oral hygiene habits, tobacco usage, and oral health beliefs were assessed using a questionnaire, and clinical examination was based on WHO oral health assessment form 2013. Results: The prevalence of periodontal disease among tribal population of Attapady was 87.5% (95% Confidence interval [CI] 78.48, 96.51).73.3% had gingival bleeding and 13.3% had no/mild periodontitis, The proportion of periodontitis was 84.2% (95% CI 75.5, 92.8). Among chronic perioodntitis subjects 22.8% had moderate periodontitis and 61.4% had severe periodontitis. A significant association was observed between tobacco use (Odds ratio [OR] 5.6, CI 2.99, 10.74), bad oral hygiene habits (OR 4.9, CI 2.64, 9.43), unfavorable oral health beliefs (OR 3.21, CI 1.63, 6.32), and periodontitis. Conclusions: The prevalence of periodontal disease and periodontitis are high among tribal population of Attapady. Unfavorable oral health belief, bad oral hygiene habits, and detrimental habits like tobacco use were the modifiable risk factors identified in this group.

Keywords: Gingival bleeding, modified community periodontal index, periodontal disease, periodontitis, prevalence


How to cite this article:
Gopalankutty N, Vadakkekuttical RJ, Remadevi S, Pillai AS. Prevalence of periodontitis and its correlates among tribal population of Attapady block, Palakkad District, Kerala. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2020;24:264-70

How to cite this URL:
Gopalankutty N, Vadakkekuttical RJ, Remadevi S, Pillai AS. Prevalence of periodontitis and its correlates among tribal population of Attapady block, Palakkad District, Kerala. J Indian Soc Periodontol [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Jun 2];24:264-70. Available from: http://www.jisponline.com/text.asp?2020/24/3/264/283781




   Introduction Top


Periodontal diseases are one of the most prevalent oral disease affecting more than 50% of the Indian community.[1] There is wide variation in the periodontal status of people living in different geographic locations, which could be assigned to differences in lifestyles, oral hygiene habits, etc., In India, there are people still living in isolation in natural and unpolluted areas far away from civilization with their traditional values, customs, beliefs, and myths intact. They are commonly known as “tribals”. Kerala holds a unique position in the tribal map of India.[2] The district of Palakkad is the homeland for various tribal communities, Attapady is located in the North East of Palakkad, and the population of Attapady consists mainly of tribal communities.

It is mandatory to know the oral and periodontal health status, associated risk factors, treatment needs, oral health beliefs, and attitude toward dental treatment, to establish an effective dental and periodontal health program in this vulnerable group. Several studies have been conducted in Attapady region regarding systemic health of tribal population. So far, there is no authoritative data about periodontal health status among tribes of Attapady. Hence, the present study was conducted to assess the prevalence of periodontal diseases among the tribal population of Attapady. An attempt was made to find the association between periodontitis and various correlates such as tobacco use, personal tooth-cleaning practices, and oral health beliefs.


   Materials and Methods Top


This population-based cross-sectional survey was carried out in three different tribal groups of Attapady Block. Data collection was done by clinical examination and a structured questionnaire. The study population consisted of adult tribes (Irulas, Mudugas, and Kurumbas) and they were selected from three panchayats – Agali, Pudur, and Sholayur of Attapady region. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee. The study has been registered under clinical trial registry with registration number (CTRI/2017/10/010282). Permissions were obtained from the Subcollector Palakkad, District Medical Officer of Palakkad, and Assistant Project Officer, Integrated Tribal Development Project (ITDP), Attapady. Informed consent was obtained from all patients. A sample of 360 individuals was included in this study, thus making the total sample size as 360. A multistage stratified random sampling was done in selection of tribal hamlets. Cluster sampling was done in selection of the study participants [Figure 1]. Sample size of each tribal community was selected on the basis of probability proportional to the size of the total 360 individuals in this survey. Adult tribes of age above 20 years were included in the study. Those who were unwilling to give informed consent and systemically debilitated persons were excluded.
Figure 1: Study design flow chart

Click here to view


Periodontal status was assessed by community periodontal index (CPI) modified by WHO in 2013.[3] A modified and content-validated, questionnaire based on WHO oral health assessment form for adults, 2013 was used to assess the sociodemographic characteristics, habits, and clinical variables, and oral health belief was assessed by modified and validated questionnaire.[4]

The oral examinations were conducted by a single calibrated examiner (NGK) using a standard mouth mirror and CPI probe. Based on loss of attachment (LOA) score, severity of perioodontitis was further categorized as no/mild periodontitis (score 0 [LOA 0–3 mm]), moderate periodontitis (score 1 [LOA 4–5 mm]), and severe periodontitis (score 2, 3 and 4 [LOA 6 mm or more]) The oral hygiene habits were assessed using a questionnaire [Figure 2] comprising 5 questions and the median of the sum was obtained. Those individuals with values above median were considered as having good oral hygiene, and those with median value and below were having bad oral hygiene habits.
Figure 2: Oral hygiene habits assessment questionnaire

Click here to view


For assessment of oral health beliefs, a structured questionnaire [Figure 3] consisting of 11 questions each question is scored as either 0 or 1 (No - 0 and Yes - 1). Total score is the sum of all 11 questions, and median of the sum was obtained. All values above the median were taken as favorable response while the median and values below it were considered as unfavorable responses.
Figure 3: Oral health attitude questionnaire

Click here to view


Statistical analysis

Mean (± standard deviation) was calculated for quantitative variables and frequency was calculated for qualitative variables. Prevalence was expressed in percentage with a confidence interval (CI) of 95%. Chi-square test was performed to find the association of periodontitis and its correlates such as oral hygiene practices, tobacco use, and oral health beliefs. Decayed-missing-filled teeth (DMFT) was calculated. The α value was set at 5%.


   Results Top


In this study, 360 individuals were examined, and the mean age was 39.81. There were 123 (34.2%) males and 237 (65.8%) females. The study population comprises of 148 (41.1%) Irulas, 108 (30.0%) Mudugas, and 104 (28.9%) Kurumbas. Their education status revealed that 50.6% were illiterate [Table 1].
Table 1: Distribution of study participants by sociodemographic characteristics

Click here to view


Among 360 individuals, the percentage of teeth present with gingival bleeding was 49.51%. The proportion of persons with gingival bleeding among this population was 73.3% [Table 2].
Table 2: Distribution of gingival bleeding score

Click here to view


The percentage of teeth present with no periodontal pockets, shallow pockets, and deep pockets were 23.87%, 25.37%, and 32.7%, respectively. The percentage of individuals with no periodontal pockets, shallow periodontal pockets, and deep periodontal pockets were 11.9%, 29.2%, and 58.3% respectively [Table 3]. The proportion of periodontal disease (periodontitis and gingivitis) in this study population was 87.5% (95% CI 78.484, 96.516) [Figure 4].
Table 3: Distribution of pocket score (community periodontal index modified)

Click here to view
Figure 4: Proportion of periodontal disease among the study participants

Click here to view


The percentage of individuals with LOA score 0, score 1, score 2, score 3, and score 4 were 13.3%, 22.8%, 39.7%, 17.5%, and 4.2%, respectively [Table 4]. The proportion of no/mild periodontitis, moderate, and severe periodontitis among this population was 13.3%, 22.8%, and 61.4%, respectively [Table 5]. The proportion of periodontitis (moderate–severe) among the tribal group was 84.2% (95% CI 75.55, 92.84) [Figure 5].
Table 4: Distribution of highest loss of attachment score

Click here to view
Table 5: Distribution of individuals based on severity of periodontitis

Click here to view
Figure 5: Proportion of periodontitis (moderate–severe) among the study population

Click here to view


Association between selected risk factors and periodontal health is shown in [Table 6]. Among 360 individuals, 75% had bad oral hygiene practices. Periodontitis was more (92%) among those having bad oral hygiene practices as compared to those who had good oral hygiene practices (69%) [Table 6]. The association between oral hygiene habits and periodontal health was found to be statistically significant. Moreover, individuals having bad oral hygiene practices are nearly five times more likely to have periodontitis (Odds ratio [OR] = 4.99) as shown in [Table 7]. Of total sample, 49.1% had favorable oral health belief and 50.83% had unfavorable oral health belief. The percentage of periodontitis among those having favorable and unfavorable oral health belief was 79.8% and 92.7%, respectively. A statistically significant difference (P< 0.05) had been found with an OR of 3.2.
Table 6: Association between selected risk factors and loss of attachment score

Click here to view
Table 7: Association between selected risk factors and periodontal health (n=351)

Click here to view


In our study, tobacco users included smokers alone, chewers alone, and smokers and chewers. It was observed that among the tobacco users, 92.4% had moderate–severe periodontitis whereas in nontobacco users, 68.2% had moderate–severe periodontitis. A statistically significant association was found between tobacco users and periodontitis (P = 0.000), OR 5.670 (95% CI 2.991, 10.749). This study showed that individuals with periodontitis had 5.6 times increased exposure to tobacco [Table 7]. The mean DMFT of this population was 4.9 ± 5.4 [Table 8].
Table 8: Distribution of caries and mean decayed-missing-filled teeth score

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


Periodontal disease is a complex immunoinflammatory disease characterized by loss of clinical attachment, destruction of periodontal ligament with subsequent alveolar bone loss. It includes both periodontitis and gingivitis. The primary etiologic factor is specific microorganism.

In this study, the proportion of periodontal disease was 87.5% (95% CI 78.4, 96.5) This was in accordance with earlier studies conducted in different parts of Indian subcontinent.[5],[6],[7],[8],[9] Philip et al. in 2013[10] reported an overall prevalence of periodontal disease in the tribal population of Nilgiris as 73.6%. Rao and Bharambe in 1993[11] reported the prevalence of periodontal disease as 99.6% in rural population of Wardha district. In all these studies, either CPI or CPITN indices was used, and there was a chance of overestimation of data by taking the highest CPI score in each sextant. However, in this study, CPI-modified index by WHO (2013) was used to overcome the above limitation. The periodontal status and gingival status of all the teeth were recorded by this index, and thus, the prevalence obtained in this study is the actual burden of periodontal disease experienced in this population.

Fifty percent of individuals participated in our study were illiterate. It is likely that the widely observed relation between educational levels and periodontal health is a function of better oral hygiene among the better educated, more positive response toward oral hygiene, and a greater frequency of dental visits among the more dentally aware.[12],[13]

In this study, 73.3% of population were having gingival bleeding. This result was not consistent with the report of earlier studies.[14],[15] Bhat and Kadanakuppe reported that 4.2% of individuals had gingival bleeding in Irula tribes.[15] The low proportion of gingival bleeding seen in the above-mentioned study may be due to the limitation of CPI index where tooth having highest CPI score is taken into consideration, and thereby, the actual gingival bleeding condition was underestimated. In the present study using CPI modified index (2013), a clear picture of gingival bleeding status was elucidated.

Bleeding on probing is an early indicator of periodontal disease.[16] An interesting observation in this study was that even though the prevalence of periodontal disease was high (87.5%), the proportion of gingival bleeding was low (73%). This low proportion of gingival bleeding as compared to the proportion periodontal disease could be due to the effect of tobacco use in this population. More than half of the study sample had the habit of tobacco use. Nicotine,[16],[17],[18] the main constituent of tobacco, has a vasoconstrictive effect on gingival blood vessels that lead to decreased blood flow and decreased gingival bleeding. This observation was in accordance with previous studies.[19],[20]

The proportion of periodontitis in this population was 84.2% (95%CI 75.5, 92.8). Among them, 22.8% had moderate periodontitis, 61.4% had severe periodontitis, and 13.3% had no/mild periodontitis. Due to the inherent limitation of CPI (LOA score index), the exact percentage of persons with no periodontitis (periodontally healthy) could not be assessed. Hence, this group (13.3%) included persons with no periodontitis and persons with mild periodontitis. Hence, this group was classified as no/mild periodontitis. Most of the study population irrespective of their subcaste experienced severe periodontitis. Poor oral hygiene, presence of deleterious habits such as smoking, chewing tobacco, unfavorable oral health beliefs, and their reluctance to visit dentist and seek treatment may account for this.

The study assessed various oral hygiene practices followed by the study population. Charcoal, mango leaves, and neem sticks were the oral hygiene materials traditionally used by them. Majority of this study population (75%) were following bad oral hygiene practices. Oral hygiene of the individual appears to be closely associated with severity of periodontal disease. In this study, the association of oral hygiene practices and severity of periodontitis was statistically significant with an OR of 4.9. Even though half of the population used tooth brush and tooth paste for cleaning their teeth, the prevalence of periodontal destruction in this population still remains at a high level of 87.5%. This could be possibly attributed to the fact that majority of the respondents had never been professionally taught the correct brushing technique and to the lack of dental health promotion program in this rural areas. Only 7.8% had visited dentist, and this also might have contributed to unhealthy dental practices like faulty toothbrushing.

In addition to poor oral hygiene, the important risk factors for periodontal disease include tobacco use and malnutrition.[13] In this study, we observed that 77.2% individuals were under the effect of deleterious habits. Among them, 74.7% were using tobacco either in the form of smoking or chewing or both. The association between tobacco users and periodontitis was found to be significant with an odds of 5.6 which implied that individuals with periodontitis had 5.6 times increased exposure to tobacco than nonperiodontitis individuals. This result was in accordance with other studies.[21],[22] Tobacco in the form of smoking results in more aggressive periodontal breakdown by changes in the composition of the subgingival plaque, with increases in the numbers and/or virulence of pathogenic organisms; changes in the host response to the bacterial challenge; or a combination of both. Smokeless tobacco contains tobacco-specific nitrosamines which are likely to be a major source of chemical injury to gingival, chronically exposed to the quid. In addition, smokeless-tobacco induced epithelial proliferation that bridges the narrow lamina propria of sites with an alveolar dehiscence might also result in loss of marginal gingiva.[23] Thus, it was clear that tobacco use may contribute to increased proportion of periodontal disease in this population.

Majority of people belonging to this region irrespective of age and sex had the habit of chewing. They use betel leaves, areca nut, and tobacco for chewing. Local availability of betel leaves and arecanut led to the increased consumption of tobacco chewing. The predominant factors which influenced the initiation of tobacco consumption at an early age in both the sexes were social customs, followed by peer pressure and as a means to concentrate on work. Unhealthy practice of tobacco use was promoted by mothers and grandmothers in adolescent girls to ease their abdominal pain during menstruation. This was supported by Dongre et al. in 2008.[24]

In this study, we made an attempt to explore the oral health beliefs, and it was interesting to notice that high proportion of study participants had unhealthy dental treatment seeking practices and poor awareness about dental treatment. Among individuals with unfavorable oral health beliefs, 90.02% experienced moderate to severe periodontitis with an odds of 3.2, and this observation was in agreement with Kwan and Holmes in 1999.[25] The elderly and adult individuals of our study believed in traditional remedies and claimed that preventive oral health measures were ineffective. In contrast to this unfavorable oral health beliefs, Paniyan tribals of Kerala presumed that dental diseases would have severe consequences if neglected.[4] Overall caries prevalence among this tribal population was high, and the average DMFT was 4.9. This is consistent with reports of several studies.[11],[26]

This population had unhealthy dental treatment-seeking practices, poor awareness, and unfavorable oral health belief toward dental treatment. There is a dire need for periodontal and other dental treatment protocol with emphasis on motivation of individuals regarding favorable oral health belief, healthy dental treatment-seeking practices, and good awareness of dental treatment. It is high time to educate these population regarding the ill effects of deleterious habits such as smoking and pan chewing on systemic and oral health. There is an urgent need for well-organized oral healthcare delivery system. Strategies should be designed with an understanding of sociocultural realities of the community. Lack of authentic data posed a major challenge before oral health care in tribal population of Attapady region. The data collected in this study would possibly help to alleviate this lacunae and thereby help in assessment of community demands.

One of the limitation of this study is that it is not possible to determine causality due to the cross-sectional design of the study. The usage of interviewer-administered questionnaires despite its numerous advantages, also introduces elements of information bias, in forms of recall and social desirability biases.


   Conclusion Top


The study population was characterized by high prevalence of periodontal disease, poor oral hygiene, high caries score, high dental treatment needs, and lack of proper dental care. Risk factors such as smoking and pan chewing are significantly associated with worsening of periodontal health. Education and motivation of this population is required to improve the oral hygiene and to refrain from deleterious habits. Under these circumstances, the implementation of a basic oral healthcare delivery system is mandatory for the tribal population of Attapady.

Acknowledgement

We are grateful to:

  1. Mr. P. B. Nooh, IAS, Former sub collector, Palakkad and Nodal Officer Attapady
  2. District Medical Officer, Civil Station, Palakkad
  3. Assistant Project Officer, ITDP, Attapady.


for their support and encouragement, by permitting us to conduct this study.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Agarwal V, Khatri M, Singh G, Gupta G, Marya CM, Kumar V. Prevalence of periodontal diseases in India. J Oral Heal Community Dent 2010;4:7-16.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Nithya NR. Globalization and the plight of tribals: The case of Kerala, India. Daw J 2014;3:727-58.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Petersen PE, Baez RJ, WHO. Oral Health Surveys: Basic Methods. 5th ed. Geneva: WHO Press; 2013.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Vivek S, Jain J, Simon SP, Battur H, Tikare S, Mahuli A. Understanding oral health beliefs and behavior among Paniyantribals in Kerala, India J Int Oral Health 2012;4:23-8.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Kumar S, Dagli RJ, Chandrakant D, Prabu D, Suhas K. Periodontal status of green Marble mine Labourers in Kesariyaji, Rajasthan, India. Oral Health Prev Dent 2008;6:217-21.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Kumar TS, Dagli RJ, Mathur A, Jain M, Balasubramanyam G, Prabu D, et al. Oral health status and practices of dentate Bhil adult tribes of Southern Rajasthan, India. Int Dent J 2009;59:133-40.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Kumar PR, John J. Assessment of periodontal status among dental fluorosis subjects using community periodontal index of treatment needs. Indian J Dent Res 2011;22:248-51.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
8.
Shaju JP, Zade RM, Das M. Prevalence of periodontitis in the Indian population: A literature review. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2011;15:29-34.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
9.
Greene JC. Periodontal disease in India: Report of an epidemiological study. J Dent Res1960;39:302-12.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Philip B, Chithresan K, Vijayaragavan VS, Maradi A. Prevalence of Periodontal diseases among the adult tribal population in Nilgiris – An epidemiological study. Int J Public Health Dent 2013;4:8-12.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Rao SP, Bharambe MS. Dental caries and periodontal diseases among urban, rural and tribal school children. Indian Pediatr 1993;30:759-64.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Papapanou PN. Epidemiology of periodontal diseases: An update. J Int Acad Periodontol 1999;1:110-6.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Petersen PE, Ogawa H. Strengthening the prevention of periodontal disease: The WHO approach. J Periodontol 2005;76:2187-93.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Smitha PS, Rosamma Joseph V. Periodontal Health Status of Tribal Population of Mananthavady Taluk, Wyanad District, Kerala. Dissertation Submitted to Calicut University; 2007.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Bhat PK, Kadanakuppe S. Periodontal health status and oral hygiene practices of Iruliga tribal community residing at Ramnagar district, Karnataka, India. J Int Oral Health 2010;2:19-26.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Clarke NG, Shephard BC, Hirsch RS. The effects of intra-arterial epinephrine and nicotine on gingival circulation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1981;52:577-82.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Palmer RM, Wilson RF, Hasan AS, Scott DA. Mechanisms of action of environmental factors – Tobacco smoking. J Clin Periodontol 2005;32 Suppl 6:180-95.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Bergström J, Floderus-Myrhed B. Co-twin control study of the relationship between smoking and some periodontal disease factors. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1983;11:113-6.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Preber H, Bergström J. Occurrence of gingival bleeding in smoker and non-smoker patients. Acta Odontol Scand 1985;43:315-20.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Dietrich T, Bernimoulin JP, Glynn RJ. The effect of cigarette smoking on gingival bleeding. J Periodontol 2004;75:16-22.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Amarasena N, Ekanayaka AN, Herath L, Miyazaki H. Tobacco use and oral hygiene as risk indicators for periodontitis. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2002;30:115-23.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Johnson GK, Slach NA. Impact of tobacco use on periodontal status. J Dent Educ 2001;65:313-21.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Baker DL, Seymour GJ. The possible pathogenesis of gingival recession. A histological study of induced recession in the rat. J Clin Periodontol 1976;3:208-19.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Dongre A, Deshmukh P, Murali N, Garg B. Tobacco consumption among adolescents in rural Wardha: Where and how tobacco control should focus its attention? Indian J Cancer 2008;45:100-6.  Back to cited text no. 24
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
25.
Kwan SY, Holmes MA. An exploration of oral health beliefs and attitudes of Chinese in West Yorkshire: A qualitative investigation. Health Educ Res 1999;14:453-60.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Jesse Joel T, Sunitha G, Murali Naik K, Muthukumar Nadar MS. Prevalance of oral disease in a tribal village at the Siruvani Foothills, Coimbatore – A pilot study. Int J Eng Res Technol 2014;3:650-3.  Back to cited text no. 26
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6], [Table 7], [Table 8]



 

Top
   
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed78    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded20    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal