Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology
Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology
Home | About JISP | Search | Accepted articles | Online Early | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | SubmissionSubscribeLogin 
Users Online: 669  Home Print this page Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font sizeWide layoutNarrow layoutFull screen layout
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 22  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 414-418

The comparison of two professional prophylaxis systems in plaque removal and debonding of orthodontic brackets


1 Department of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
2 Private Orthodontist, Hamadan, Iran
3 Department of Prosthodontics, Dental School, Hamadan, Iran
4 Department of Periodontics, Dental School, Hamadan, Iran
5 Laser Research Center, Dental School, Hamadan, Iran
6 Private Dentist, Hamadan, Iran
7 Department of Biostatistics, Non-Communicable Diseases Research Center, School of Public Health and Modeling, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran

Correspondence Address:
Amirarsalan Hooshyarfard
Department of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan
Iran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_387_17

Rights and Permissions

Introduction: During orthodontic treatment, patients are expected to undergo consistent periodic prophylaxis as a result of complexities in oral hygiene. The aim of this study was to investigate, analyze, and compare the effectiveness of two professional prophylaxis systems of rubber cup polishing (RCP) and air-powder polishing (APP) in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment based on different levels of plaque and pigment on teeth and the extent of attachment of brackets after prophylaxis. Materials and Methods: A total of 50 patients were selected for this clinical trial study. A couple of months after the orthodontic treatment, the patients were placed on professional prophylaxis in terms of the plaque index. Randomized cross-arch prophylaxis (right maxilla with left mandible), RCP (left maxilla with right mandible), and APP were carried out on the patients. The main indexes in the study (number of plaque removal and debonding), the work time duration per second, and convenience of patients using visual analog scale in each of the methods were evaluated as minor factors. Data were recorded in a special checklist. Results: The mean of the plaque index and the time spent on RCP were observed to be higher than APP. The average satisfaction rate of patients with RCP was higher than APP. The debonding of the bracket and the tooth was not observed in any of the methods. Conclusion: APP is more efficient than RCP for performing professional prophylaxis of orthodontic patients.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1041    
    Printed19    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded123    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal