Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology
Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology
Home | About JISP | Search | Accepted articles | Online Early | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | SubmissionSubscribeLogin 
Users Online: 756  Home Print this page Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font sizeWide layoutNarrow layoutFull screen layout


 
   Table of Contents    
CASE REPORT
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 22  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 360-364  

Management of recurrent pyogenic granuloma with platelet-rich fibrin membrane


Department of Periodontology, The Oxford Dental College, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

Date of Submission01-Feb-2018
Date of Acceptance23-Apr-2018
Date of Web Publication20-Jul-2018

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Koel Debnath
#106, Block-B; GK Jewel City Apartment, Kudlu Harlur Main Road, Kudlu, Bengaluru - 560 068, Karnataka
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_86_18

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 


Pyogenic granuloma (PG) is an inflammatory hyperplastic lesion of the oral cavity. The most common etiological factors for PG are low-grade local irritation, traumatic injury, or hormonal factors. Clinically, it appears to be smooth or lobulated exophytic lesion. It appears to be erythematous papule and is either pedunculated or has a sessile base. The lesion has shown a recurrence rate of 15.8%. Various treatment modalities have been present in the literature. The present article emphasized the treatment modalities and an effort to treat the recurrence of PG with the use of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) membrane. This case report presents a 28-year-old female patient who had reported with PG that recurred twice in 2-year period. The lesion appeared to be recurrent with sessile base and was diagnosed clinically and histopathologically as PG. The PG was excised with the conventional scalpel method exposing the underlying bone. The exposed surface was then covered with PRF membrane. At 12-month follow-up period, the patient did not show any further recurrence of the lesion.

Keywords: Conditioned gingival enlargment, pyogenic granuloma, platelet rich fibrin


How to cite this article:
Debnath K, Chatterjee A. Management of recurrent pyogenic granuloma with platelet-rich fibrin membrane. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2018;22:360-4

How to cite this URL:
Debnath K, Chatterjee A. Management of recurrent pyogenic granuloma with platelet-rich fibrin membrane. J Indian Soc Periodontol [serial online] 2018 [cited 2020 Feb 25];22:360-4. Available from: http://www.jisponline.com/text.asp?2018/22/4/360/237208




   Introduction Top


Inflammatory hyperplasia was used to describe large nodular growths of oral mucosa. Histologically, it represents fibrous and granulation tissue.[1] Clinical fibroma, epulis fissuratum, pulp polyp, palatal papillary hyperplasia, giant cell granuloma, pregnancy epulis, and pyogenic granuloma (PG) fall under the umbrella of fibrous inflammatory hyperplasia.[2] Hullihen in 1844 first presented a report and had termed it as PG.[3] Later, in 1904, Hartzell termed it as granuloma pyogenicum.[4] It is the most common nonneoplastic tumor-like growth of the oral cavity. PG is a reactive tumor which arises in response to various stimuli due to local irritation and traumatic activity of tumor cells and on the rate of cell death. Prevalence of PG is more common in females in the second decade of life, probably due to vascularization effect of estrogen and progesterone.[5] In the oral cavity, 75% of the cases had predilection for the gingiva and it was accounted by calculus or any foreign material.[6] Along with it, stimulant or injury present in the gingival crevice may pave the way for the occurrence of PG, and the irritation of the fibrovascular connective tissue results in exuberant proliferation of a granulation tissue. Other factors that could cause PG are some hormones, certain drugs (e.g., oral contraceptives and isotretinoin), bacteria, and viruses. In addition, deciduous teeth injury, aberrant tooth development, and even tooth eruption have been considered as predisposing factors for PG development.[7] The other predominant sites affected were lips, tongue, buccal mucosa, and hard palate. The known stimuli in the maxillary gingiva are more commonly affected than the mandibular one and the anterior region is more commonly affected than the posterior region. Furthermore, the lesions are more frequently on the facial aspect of gingiva than on the lingual side.[2] Clinically, PG appears smooth or lobulated with sessile or pedunculated base which is usually hemorrhagic and compressible and may develop a dumbbell-shaped mass. It was noted that 66% were sessile in nature and 77% had a pedunculated type of lesion.[8] The lesion usually develops slowly and is asymptomatic. However, in some cases, it may develop fast, reaches its full size, and remains stable. The size ranges from a few millimeters to several centimeters, but it rarely exceeds 2 cm. The differential diagnosis of PG comprises peripheral giant cell granuloma, peripheral ossifying fibroma, peripheral odontogenic fibroma, hemangioma, hyperplastic gingival inflammation, conventional granulation tissue, Kaposi's sarcoma, bacillary angiomatosis, angiosarcoma, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and metastatic cancers.[1] Final diagnosis can be accurately made based on histopathological investigations. Numerous treatment modalities have been defined for PG. However, simple surgical excision of the lesion is the usual treatment. A surgical excision is recommended involving 2mm of un involved healthy margin surrounding the lesion. During the excision, irritant agents such as dental plaque, calculus, foreign bodies, defective restoration, and source of trauma should be eliminated.[5],[9] Although PG does not show infiltrative tendency or malignant transformation potential, the recurrence rate after simple excision is comparatively high about 15.8% and requires a re-excision of the lesion in the near future.[6] The recurrence of the lesions could be due to deficient excision, failure to eliminate etiologic factors, or sometimes due to re-injury of lesions. The other causes could be due to multiple deep satellite nodules that encircle the site of original lesions (Warner–Wilson Jones syndrome). It was mentioned that the recurrence rate is much higher in gingival cases than any other oral mucosal PG.[5],[10]

The present article describes a case report of a 28-year-old female patient who had recurrent PG twice in a 2-year period. The patient was followed up for a 12-month period following the conservative excision procedure and placement of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) membrane to check for the recurrence of the lesion.


   Case Report Top


A 28-year-old female patient came to the Department of Periodontics, Bengaluru, India, with a chief complaint of swelling on the right mandibular front tooth region for 3 weeks. The lesion at the initial stage was of poppy seed in size which gradually increased within 3-week time as a size of dumbbell. The lesion was painless but caused discomfort and often bled on slight provocation. She stated that a similar type of growth in the same area was present for 2 years. The patient's past history revealed the appearance of the lesion during the third trimester of pregnancy which was excised after parturition. The lesion reappeared in the same area approximately 7 months later following the excision. The lesions were excised by scalpel method as mentioned by the patient, and the histopathological examination was performed for the excised lesion which confirmed the diagnosis of PG. The patient stated that the present recurrence of the lesion occurred after approximately 8 months from the last excision performed.

No relevant medical and family history was reported by the patient. On intraoral examination, the lesion was present around the right labial mandibular anterior tooth region extending from the distal aspect of incisor to the mesial aspect of the canine region. It measured approximately 3 mm × 4 mm in dimension. On visual examination, it appeared reddish pink as observed in [Figure 1]. It was large and lobulated with a sessile base. On palpation, the lesion was firm and resilient with bleeding on slight provocation. Periodontal examination revealed good plaque index score of <1 as per Silness and Loe in 1964[11] and mild gingival inflammation as per gingival index score of <1 by Loe and Silness in 1963.[12] Intraoral periapical radiograph showed no horizontal or vertical bone loss in the region as contemplated in [Figure 2]. The differential diagnosis of peripheral giant cell granuloma, peripheral ossifying fibroma, hemangioma, and hyperplastic gingival inflammation was ruled out based on the recurrence of the lesion and similar growth. Following the previous histological findings and clinical examination, the lesion was diagnosed as a recurrent PG.
Figure 1: Preoperative view of pyogenic granuloma in mandibular anterior tooth region

Click here to view
Figure 2: Intraoral radiographic view of mandibular anterior tooth region showing no bone loss

Click here to view


The patient was explained about the nature and etiology of the lesion and also the possible reasons for the frequent recurrence of the lesion. Conventional surgical procedure by scalpel method was chosen for the excision of the lesion. A complete excision of the lesion could expose the underlying bone leading to resorption. An autologous PRF membrane was placed on the excised area. A written signed informed consent was taken from the patient before the commencement of the surgical procedure.

The area of interest was anesthetized with local anesthesia with a solution of 2% lignocaine with 1:200,000 adrenaline. A circumferential full-thickness incision was given. The incision extended from the distal aspect of incisor to the mesial aspect of the canine region circumferentially including 2 mm of an adjacent gingival region. Scalpel excision was performed from the base of the lesion exposing the bony surface as observed in [Figure 3] and [Figure 4]. The excised lesion as shown in [Figure 5] was then transferred to a bottle of 10% formalin solution and was sent for histopathological evaluation. The denuded bone surface was then covered with PRF membrane. The PRF was prepared as per Choukron et al's. protocol in 2001[13] as shown in [Figure 6]. 10 ml of the patient's blood was withdrawn from the antecubital vein and was immediately transferred to REMI-4C centrifugation machine within 30 s. It was centrifuged at 2700 rpm for 12 min.
Figure 3: Incision given around the lesion by scalpel method

Click here to view
Figure 4: Excision of the lesion caused exposure of the underlying bone as encircled

Click here to view
Figure 5: Excised lesion

Click here to view
Figure 6: Preparation of platelet-rich fibrin membrane

Click here to view


The clot was then squeezed between a sterile gauze, and a PRF membrane was placed into the exposed bone surface.[14] The membrane was further stabilized by suturing it with direct interrupted suture on the mesial and distal aspects as shown in [Figure 7]. The periodontal dressing was placed. Postoperative instruction was given to the patient and chlorhexidine mouthwash (0.12%) was prescribed to the patient.
Figure 7: Placement of platelet-rich fibrin membrane on the exposed bone surface

Click here to view


The histopathological evaluation showed a large ulcerated area covered with fibrin exudate. The epithelium appeared to be hyperplastic, edematous, and was infiltrated with inflammatory cells. Underneath the epithelium, numerous small endothelial lined channels in the lobular structure were seen, suggestive of perivascular inflammation. The lesion had a fibrous appearance with neutrophils, plasma cells, and lymphocyte inflammatory cell infiltrate. The histopathological slide at ×20 and ×40 magnification confirmed the diagnosis of PG as shown in [Figure 8]. The patient was recalled at 2-week follow-up period where a complete epithelialization over the denuded bwone surface was seen as contemplated in [Figure 9]. At 12-month follow-up period, recurrence of the lesion was not observed as shown in [Figure 10].
Figure 8: Histopathological section at ×20 and ×40. (a) Hyperplastic epithelium; (b) dense inflammatory cell infiltrate in the connective tissue; (c) perivascular inflammation

Click here to view
Figure 9: Two-week follow-up period

Click here to view
Figure 10: Twelve-month follow-up period

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


PG is a well-identified inflammatory hyperplastic oral lesion which comprises about 1.85% of all oral pathologies, other than caries and gingivitis. Usually, the lesion is neither symptomatic nor painful, but minor trauma to the growth can induce significant bleeding.[15] It arises due to low-grade local irritation, traumatic injuries, and hormonal fluctuations. PG creates esthetic problem and leads to functional problems with mastication, swallowing, and speaking. The rapid growth of PG is mainly attributed to factors such as inducible nitric oxide synthase, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), basic fibroblast growth factor, and connective tissue growth factor.[5] The present case report describes a lesion which had a history of recurrence twice within 2 years on the same area. The recurrence of the lesion in the present case could be attributed to the most common cause of hormonal changes as the patient gave a history of appearance of the lesion during her third trimester of pregnancy. The persistent influence of increase in estrogen level increases vascular permeability enhancing the acute gingival inflammation and hyperplastic gingival tissues. The lesion reappeared twice after 7–8 months approximately which could be attributed to incomplete excision of the lesion.[5] Various treatment modalities are present in literature for the treatment of PG. The most common method of treatment is by surgical convention. The other treatment modalities for the treatment of PG include the use of laser, cryotherapy, and electrocauterization, which have rendered successful results. In spite of the success of the treatment modalities, it convoys certain advantages and disadvantages of its own. From the bountiful treatments, the laser and electrosurgery have reported injury to the neighboring tissues and delayed wound healing, although bloodless surgical field has shown patient comfort, less pain, and healing without scar formation.[5]

In the present case as the patient had the recurrence of lesion, scalpel method was chosen over the other mentioned techniques. As per Asnaashari et al. in 2014, the reported recurrence rate of lesion following conventional method was 16%.[10] This treatment modality was preferred as the lesion had a sessile base and a history of repeated recurrence. The excision was aimed to completely excise the underlying soft tissue in an attempt to prevent the recurrence of the lesion. The procedure had led to exposure of bone surface. Wilderman in 1964[16] stated that, following full-thickness incision, the denuded bone results in superficial necrosis at 1–3 days. Osteoclastic resorption reaches a peak at 4–6 days, which thereby declines. This further results in loss of bone of about 1 mm 3 and greater if bone was thin which was mostly seen in anterior mandibular region due to its thin alveolar housing.

To prevent the sequence of events following exposure of the bone surface, PRF membrane was placed. PRF is the activated form of a plasmatic molecule called fibrinogen. The fibrin formed after the centrifugation is transformed into biologic glue which consolidates the initial platelet cluster. It thus forms a protective wall along vascular breaches during coagulation. The fibrin architecture entraps various numbers of leukocytes in the fibrin matrix, allowing an intense slow release of growth factors, and favors the sealing of wound borders and facilitates rapid epithelialization. The use of PRF membrane was also known to release various pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interferon-γ, tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin (IL)-1β, and IL-6, which helps in T-cell differentiation, and growth factors such as VEGF, platelet-derived growth factor, fibroblast growth factor, transforming growth factor, and insulin growth factor, which acts as an anti-inflammatory agent and promotes faster healing [17] The PRF membrane has been used as a palatal bandage following harvesting of subepithelial connective tissue graft due to its fibrin meshwork and release of growth factors for a prolonged period of time.[18] The use of PRF membrane has also been successful in gingival recession defects,[19] intrabony defects,[20] furcation defects,[21] and epithelialization following depigmentation procedure.[22] A recent systematic review by Miron et al. in 2017 has proven the immense potential of PRF on wound healing after regenerative therapy for the management of various soft-tissue defects.[23]

The same result in terms of epithelialization and patient comfort was achieved following its placement over the denuded bone surface. At 12-month follow-up period, no recurrence of the lesion was observed. A complete removal of the lesion exposing the underlying bone surface was attributed to the success of the therapy. The use of PRF membrane following excision of recurrent PG also prevented the underlying resorption and an esthetic soft-tissue coverage. However, the treatment of recurrent PG with PRF membrane followed up for 12 months was executed for the first time as per a thorough literature search.

Further research should be done to perform the same in randomized controlled clinical trial design and with statistical evaluation of clinical and esthetic outcome.


   Conclusion Top


The use of scalpel method for excision of PG is a safe technique with various clinical benefits. The recurrent lesions should be wisely treated with the aim of removing the etiological factors and also not to have a detrimental effect on the underlying and adjacent soft and hard tissues. The autologous biomaterial PRF membrane due to its immense biological activity in wound healing and regeneration has played a pivotal role in the success of the therapy.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient has given her consent for her images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patient understand that her name and initial will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Burket LW, Greenberg MS, Glick M. Burket's Oral Medicine Diagnosis and Treatment. 10th ed. Hamilton, Ont.: BC Decker; 2003. p. 141-2.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Neville BW, Damm DD, Allen CM, Bouquot JE. Pyogenic granuloma. In: Neville BW, Damm DD, Allen CM, Bouquot JE, editors. Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2009. p. 447-9.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Hullihen SP. Case of aneurism by anastomosis of superior maxillae. Am J Dent Sci 1884;4:160-2.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Hartzell M. Granuloma pyogenicum. J Cutan Dis Syph 1904;22:520-5.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Jafarzadeh H, Sanatkhani M, Mohtasham N. Oral pyogenic granuloma: A review. J Oral Sci 2006;48:167-75.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Kamal R, Dahiya P, Puri A. Oral pyogenic granuloma: Various concepts of etiopathogenesis. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 2012;16:79-82.  Back to cited text no. 6
  [Full text]  
7.
Regezi JA, Sciubba JJ, Jordan RC. Oral Pathology: Clinical Pathologic Considerations. 4th ed. Philadelphia: W B Saunders; 2003. p. 115-6.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Bouquot JE, Nikai H. Lesions of the oral cavity. In: Gnepp DR, editor. Diagnostic Surgical Pathology of Head and Neck. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2001. p. 141-233.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Gomes SR, Shakir QJ, Thaker PV, Tavadia JK. Pyogenic granuloma of the gingiva: A misnomer? – A case report and review of literature. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2013;17:514-9.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
10.
Asnaashari M, Bigom-Taheri J, Mehdipoor M, Bakhshi M, Azari-Marhabi S. Posthaste outgrow of lip pyogenic granuloma after diode laser removal. J Lasers Med Sci 2014;5:92-5.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Silness J, Loe H. Periodontal disease in pregnancy. II. Correlation between oral hygiene and periodontal condition. Acta Odontol Scand 1964;22:121-35.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Loe H, Silness J. Periodontal disease in pregnancy. I. Prevalence and severity. Acta Odontol Scand 1963;21:533-51.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Choukron J, Adda F, Schoeffler C, Vervella A. An opportunity in perioimplantology: The PRF (French). Implantodontie 2001;42:55-62.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Gassling V, Douglas T, Warnke PH, Açil Y, Wiltfang J, Becker ST, et al. Platelet-rich fibrin membranes as scaffolds for periosteal tissue engineering. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:543-9.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Bhaskar SN, Jacoway JR. Pyogenic granuloma-clinical features, incidence, histology, and result of treatment: Report of 242 cases. J Oral Surg 1966;24:391-8.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Wilderman MN. Exposure of bone in periodontal surgery. Dent Clin North Am 1963;8:23.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Dohan Ehrenfest DM, Bielecki T, Jimbo R, Barbé G, Del Corso M, Inchingolo F, et al. Do the fibrin architecture and leukocyte content influence the growth factor release of platelet concentrates? An evidence-based answer comparing a pure platelet-rich plasma (P-PRP) gel and a leukocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF). Curr Pharm Biotechnol 2012;13:1145-52.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Aravindaksha SP, Batra P, Sood V, Kumar A, Gupta G. Use of platelet rich fibrin (PRF) membrane as palatal bandage. Clin Adv Periodontics 2013;4:1-6.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Aleksić Z, Janković S, Dimitrijević B, Divnić-Resnik T, Milinković I, Leković V, et al. The use of platelet-rich fibrin membrane in gingival recession treatment. Srp Arh Celok Lek 2010;138:11-8.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Pradeep AR, Rao NS, Agarwal E, Bajaj P, Kumari M, Naik SB, et al. Comparative evaluation of autologous platelet-rich fibrin and platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of 3-wall intrabony defects in chronic periodontitis: A randomized controlled clinical trial. J Periodontol 2012;83:1499-507.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Bajaj P, Pradeep AR, Agarwal E, Rao NS, Naik SB, Priyanka N, et al. Comparative evaluation of autologous platelet-rich fibrin and platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of mandibular degree II furcation defects: A randomized controlled clinical trial. J Periodontal Res 2013;48:573-81.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Bansal M, Kumar A, Puri K, Khatri M, Gupta G, Vij H, et al. Clinical and histologic evaluation of platelet-rich fibrin accelerated epithelialization of gingival wound. J Cutan Aesthet Surg 2016;9:196-200.  Back to cited text no. 22
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
23.
Miron RJ, Fujioka-Kobayashi M, Bishara M, Zhang Y, Hernandez M, Choukroun J, et al. Platelet-rich fibrin and soft tissue wound healing: A systematic review. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 2017;23:83-99.  Back to cited text no. 23
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7], [Figure 8], [Figure 9], [Figure 10]



 

Top
   
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
   Case Report
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1641    
    Printed25    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded233    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal