Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology
Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology
Home | About JISP | Search | Accepted articles | Online Early | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | SubmissionSubscribeLogin 
Users Online: 996  Home Print this page Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font sizeWide layoutNarrow layoutFull screen layout


 
   Table of Contents    
CASE REPORT
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 21  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 245-248  

Root coverage of a wide anterior mucogingival defect with epithelial embossed connective tissue graft and its evaluation using root coverage esthetic scores


Faculty of Dentistry, SEGi University, Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia

Date of Submission15-Sep-2017
Date of Acceptance29-Oct-2017
Date of Web Publication16-Jan-2018

Correspondence Address:
Priyadarshini Ramamurthy
Faculty of Dentistry, SEGi University, No. 9 Jalan Teknologi, Taman Sains, 47810, Kota Damansara, Selangor
Malaysia
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_221_17

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

New and innovative surgical techniques are necessary to help the clinician ensure the best results and satisfy patient's expectations. One such periodontal problem that has been challenging to the dental practitioners and impacts the oral health quality of life of patients has been gingival recession. When present anteriorly where esthetics is a major concern, patient centric parameters too become paramount. Root coverage esthetic score (RES) evaluation helps to keep the patient outcomes in mind. This case reports the successful treatment of a wide anterior mucogingival defect using epithelial embossed connective tissue graft which was evaluated for the first time using RES.

Keywords: Connective tissue, esthetic, gingival recession


How to cite this article:
Rath A, Fernandes BA, Sidhu P, Ramamurthy P. Root coverage of a wide anterior mucogingival defect with epithelial embossed connective tissue graft and its evaluation using root coverage esthetic scores. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2017;21:245-8

How to cite this URL:
Rath A, Fernandes BA, Sidhu P, Ramamurthy P. Root coverage of a wide anterior mucogingival defect with epithelial embossed connective tissue graft and its evaluation using root coverage esthetic scores. J Indian Soc Periodontol [serial online] 2017 [cited 2019 Dec 15];21:245-8. Available from: http://www.jisponline.com/text.asp?2017/21/3/245/221467


   Introduction Top


Gingival recession or marginal soft-tissue recession is the displacement of the gingival margin apical to cemento-enamel junction.[1] Although it seldom results in tooth loss, its sequel, such as root sensitivity, caries, abrasion, and esthetics have always been a major concern.[2] Various treatment modalities have been described to obtain root coverage in gingival recession. Among them, the one which yields the most predictable and satisfactory root coverage is the subepithelial, connective tissue graft (SCTG). This technique and its many variations have provided significant root coverage, clinical attachment gain with wider zone of attached gingiva (ZAG) and hence has been the most sought-after gold standard for periodontal plastic procedures.[3]

The outcome of two such variations of subepithelial connective tissue, SCTG with and without epithelial collar was compared, and it was found that a greater zone of attached gingiva was achieved when flap advancement was not employed, though there was no significant difference in root coverage percentage between the two.[4] Some cases also showed poor adaptation of the flap, cyst formation and required a second procedure of gingivoplasty, especially in the esthetic zone with epithelial collar. A novel technique which facilitated the mobilization of a connective tissue graft with an overlying epithelium, that gives its characteristic embossed appearance (epithelial embossed graft) fits the defect site accurately, provided prolonged protection of underlying healing process and also allowed the development of a wider zone of attached gingiva.[5] However, there is insufficient evidence to prove the predictability of this technique and its long-term esthetic evaluation. One of the reliable methods for assessing the esthetic outcome is the root coverage esthetic score (RES) which helps record the patient perceived outcomes apart from the percentage of root coverage.[6]

The present report describes one such novel surgical technique to manage wide Class I/II gingival recessions with epithelial “embossed” connective graft that exactly fits the defect site without any flap advancement and evaluates the results using RES.


   Case Report Top


A 32-year-old male patient reported to the dental clinic with the chief complaint of unesthetic appearance of the gums and hypersensitivity in relation to his upper right canine. No significant medical history and habits were reported.

On clinical examination, he had relatively fair oral hygiene. Periodontal examination revealed localized gingival inflammation in relation to maxillary right canine, with a probing pocket depth of 2 mm and clinical attachment loss of 5 mm with deep/wide Class I gingival recession [Figure 1]. The keratinized tissue (KT) thickness was around 2 mm which was measured at the center of an imaginary line from mucogingival junction (MGJ) to marginal gingiva, using an endodontic file with stopper after anesthetizing the region. Intraoral radiograph in relation to the tooth concerned showed no bone loss.
Figure 1: Preoperative view of the wide Class I gingival recession at 13 region

Click here to view


Considering the height (3 mm) and width (5 mm) of the defect, the treatment decided on was root coverage using an epithelial embossed graft technique. The treatment plan was explained to the patient, and a duly signed written consent was obtained. Oral prophylaxis was done 2 weeks before surgery.

Under local anesthesia, a sulcular incision was made in the right canine region, also involving mesial aspect of the first premolar and distal aspect of the lateral incisor as described by Raetzke.[7] Envelop flap was raised without making vertical incisions [Figure 2]. Thorough root planing was done. The connective tissue graft was procured from the contralateral side of the palate between the left first and second premolar region. A tinfoil template was cut fitting the defect size precisely and transferred to the palate from where the donor tissue was to be obtained. It was placed in relation to the upper left premolar palatal region, and an incision was made around the tinfoil which extended 3 mm close to the gingival margin on either side [Figure 3]. The epithelium was undermined 3 mm from the incision. Releasing incision was given so that only the connective tissue of the surrounding 3 mm was separated and the donor tissue was removed. The graft tissue had connective tissue on all the sides, and its center region was embossed with epithelium which matched the defect exactly [Figure 4]. The graft was tucked into the envelope made at the recipient site, with the “embossed epithelium” exactly covering the recession defect [Figure 5]. A tacking suturing technique using 4–0 silk suture was used to secure the tissues, with the papilla and graft being picked up together on each side, without tension for uninterrupted healing [Figure 6]. Similarly, the palatal area at the donor site was sutured with 4–0 silk continuous sling sutures. A periodontal dressing was kept in place for 1 week. Analgesics (paracetamol 500 mg twice daily for 3 days) were prescribed, and the patient was instructed to rinse with 1:1diluted 0.2% chlorhexidine mouth rinse for 1 min twice daily for 10 days. The periodontal dressing (Coepack ®) and sutures were removed 1 week later, and oral hygiene instructions were reinforced. The patient was examined on subsequent postsurgical appointments [Figure 7] and [Figure 8] at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months. Clinical parameters with RES scores were recorded on each visit and at 12 months postoperatively [Table 1] and [Table 2].
Figure 2: Envelope flap prepared at the recipient site

Click here to view
Figure 3: Outline of the graft prepared at the donor site using a tinfoil template

Click here to view
Figure 4: Epithelial embossed graft procured

Click here to view
Figure 5: Graft tucked into the envelope pouch at the recipient site

Click here to view
Figure 6: Sutures placed to secure the graft

Click here to view
Figure 7: Postoperative view of the recipient site at 3 months

Click here to view
Figure 8: Postoperative view of the recipient site at 12 months

Click here to view
Table 1: Periodontal parameters which were measured preoperatively and postoperatively at 6 and 12 months interval at 13 region

Click here to view
Table 2: Root esthetic score scores (Cairo et al., 2009) which were measured preoperatively and postoperatively at 12 months at 13 region

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


Obtaining root coverage has become more predictable with advances in the understanding of soft tissue healing. The search for an ideal technique has led to pioneering of various surgical techniques. These procedures have not only just accomplished the functional but also the esthetic requisites of root coverage. The classic technique of SCTG by Langer and Langer was reported in 1985.[8] Although it has proved to be a pioneering technique in the field of periodontal plastic surgery, it also has displayed a risk many a time for incomplete root coverage in cases of deep/wide Miller Class I and II defects because of healing by secondary intention and exposure of the graft during the suturing process.[9] It has also been seen that flap advancement over SCTG has failed to yield a significant increase in width of ZAG with the flap remaining nonkeratinized. Hence, many modifications of this classic technique have been adopted to achieve better root coverage. One such technique by Sterrett, the epithelial embossed graft has shown to be highly predictable in gingival recession therapy for deep/wide Class I/II defect.[5] The fundamental prerequisite for any surgical outcome is an uneventful healing. In the present case, this can be attributed to the double blood supply at the recipient site from the underlying periosteum and overlying recipient flap. The advantages of this technique are twofold. First, the keratinizing epithelium in the shape of the defect allows the graft to heal by primary intention. Second, even if the epithelium sloughs away the integrity of the underlying connective tissue leads to favorable predictable healing.[5] Moreover, the clot stability is also significant and attributes to tensionless flap with minimal trauma over the wound bed. The latter must be assured by applying accurate suturing technique and minimal incisions as seen in this case and that reported by Ramakrishnan et al., where in the postoperative success of the technique in terms of complete root coverage, supported the use of this technique for deep and wide gingival recession.[10]

Recently, a case of palatal recession that was reported to be treated using the same technique demonstrated successful root coverage which strengthens the evidence for the versatility of this technique. However, the lack of evidence in terms of a standardized esthetic score in terms of color match, alignment of MGJ, and tissue texture was seen in these previous cases.[11]

In periodontal plastic procedures, complete root coverage has always been the main outcome of interest. More recent approaches have emphasized on patient-reported outcomes and his/her direct perception about the outcome as well. RES has shown a better match with patient-perceived outcomes compared to the percentage of root coverage alone.[11] Therefore, in this report, RES was also incorporated which showed a full score of 1 in all the aspects [Table 2]. This made the postoperative results more objective and also had a positive influence on the reliability of the embossed technique not only just from the clinician's perspective but also from patient's viewpoint.[12] A similar effect was evaluated in a study by Kerner et al.[13] Another important aspect of the outcome of this technique was significant gain in ZAG and KT thickness which was about 9 and 8 mm, respectively. A densely collagenated attached gingiva serves as a physical barrier to inflammatory spread in turn intervening the progress of periodontal disease in these susceptible areas.[14]

However, this technique exhibited limitation in terms of difficulty of standardization of the graft thickness which may result in some esthetic alterations that was also observed post operatively in this case.


   Conclusion Top


This technique did feature results which were satisfying for both patient and the clinician for a type of periodontal defect that has shown unpredictable root coverage at times with conventional methods. In addition, RES system may be very helpful in assessing esthetic outcomes following any root coverage procedures. Moreover, long-term randomized clinical trials are needed to strengthen the evidence in favor of this technique over conventional connective tissue graft techniques.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
   References Top

1.
American Academy of Periodontology. Glossary of Periodontal Terms. 4th ed. Chicago: American Academy of Periodontology; 2001.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Miller PD Jr. Using periodontal plastic surgery techniques. J Am Dent Assoc 1990;121:485-8.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Wang HL, Bunyaratavej P, Labadie M, Shyr Y, MacNeil RL. Comparison of 2 clinical techniques for treatment of gingival recession. J Periodontol 2001;72:1301-11.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Bouchard P, Etienne D, Ouhayoun JP, Nilvéus R. Subepithelial connective tissue grafts in the treatment of gingival recessions. A comparative study of 2 procedures. J Periodontol 1994;65:929-36.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Sterrett JD. The management of large mucogingival defects with an “epithelial embossed” connective tissue graft. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2008;28:577-83.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Cairo F, Nieri M, Cattabriga M, Cortellini P, De Paoli S, De Sanctis M, et al. Root coverage esthetic score after treatment of gingival recession: An interrater agreement multicenter study. J Periodontol 2010;81:1752-8.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Raetzke PB. Covering localized areas of root exposure employing the “envelope” technique. J Periodontol 1985;56:397-402.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Langer B, Langer L. The subepithelial connective tissue graft technique for root coverage. J Periodontol 1985;56:715-20.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Vergara JA, Caffesse RG. Localized gingival recessions treated with the original envelope technique: A report of 50 consecutive patients. J Periodontol 2004;75:1397-403.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Ramakrishnan T, Kaur M, Aggarwal K. Root coverage using epithelial embossed connective tissue graft. Indian J Dent Res 2011;22:726-8.  Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
11.
Tonetti MS, Jepsen S. Clinical efficacy of periodontal plastic surgery procedures: Consensus report of group 2 of the 10th Europeon Workshop on Periodontology. J Clin Periodontol 2014;15:36-43.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Cairo F, Rotundo R, Miller PD, Pini Prato GP. Root coverage esthetic score: A system to evaluate the esthetic outcome of the treatment of gingival recession through evaluation of clinical cases. J Periodontol 2009;80:705-10.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Kerner S, Katsahian S, Sarfati A, Korngold S, Jakmakjian S, Tavernier B, et al. A comparison of methods of aesthetic assessment in root coverage procedures. J Clin Periodontol 2009;36:80-7.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Thankkappan P, Roy S, Mandlik VB. Comparative evaluation of management of gingival recession using subepithelial connective tissue graft and collagen membrane by periodontal microsurgical technique: A clinical study of 40 cases. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2016;20:189-94.  Back to cited text no. 14
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7], [Figure 8]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
   
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
   Case Report
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1452    
    Printed23    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded164    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal