|Year : 2016 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 82-87
Use of modified lip repositioning technique associated with esthetic crown lengthening for treatment of excessive gingival display: A case report of multiple etiologies
Matheus Bortoluzzi Mantovani, Eduardo Clemente Souza, Fabiano Carlos Marson, Giovani Oliveira Corrêa, Patrícia Saram Progiante, Cléverson Oliveira Silva
Masters Program in Prosthetic Dentistry, Ingá University (Uningá), Maringá/PR, Brazil
|Date of Submission||16-Jan-2015|
|Date of Acceptance||15-Jul-2015|
|Date of Web Publication||25-Feb-2016|
Cléverson Oliveira Silva
Rodovia PR 317, 6114 – Maringá, Paraná
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Excessive gingival display during smile can result in compromised esthetics. This study aims to report a case of excessive gingival display with multiple etiologies treated by means of modified lip repositioning technique associated with esthetic crown lengthening. A 23-year-old female patient, with 5-mm gingival display during smile caused by altered passive eruption and hypermobility of the upper lip, underwent the modified lip repositioning technique associated with gingivectomy followed by flap elevation and ostectomy/osteoplasty. Seven months after the second procedure, the patient had her esthetic complaint solved appearing stable in the observation period. The modified lip repositioning technique is an effective procedure employed to reduce gingival display and when associated with esthetic clinical crown lengthening, can appropriately treat cases of gummy smile.
Keywords: Crown lengthening, excessive gingival display, lip repositioning
|How to cite this article:|
Mantovani MB, Souza EC, Marson FC, Corrêa GO, Progiante PS, Silva CO. Use of modified lip repositioning technique associated with esthetic crown lengthening for treatment of excessive gingival display: A case report of multiple etiologies. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2016;20:82-7
|How to cite this URL:|
Mantovani MB, Souza EC, Marson FC, Corrêa GO, Progiante PS, Silva CO. Use of modified lip repositioning technique associated with esthetic crown lengthening for treatment of excessive gingival display: A case report of multiple etiologies. J Indian Soc Periodontol [serial online] 2016 [cited 2019 Jan 21];20:82-7. Available from: http://www.jisponline.com/text.asp?2016/20/1/82/164746
| Introduction|| |
he smile is a facial expression that originates from many human emotional aspects. For societies that value esthetics, smiling may function as a rule to achieve a good first impression. Many factors are associated with a pleasant smile, for instance, the upper and lower lip line, gingival health, correct anatomy, and teeth proportion. Amount of gingival display is among the aspects that comprises smile esthetics and plays an important role in smile attractiveness.
In this context, excessive gingival display, also known as a gummy smile, affects approximately 10% of the population aged between 20 and 30 years old. It is highly prevalent among women and decreases with age due to loss of muscle tone in both upper and lower lips. It may be caused by hypermobility of upper lip elevator muscles; altered passive eruption (APE); accentuated vertical maxillary growth; maxillary dentoalveolar extrusion; and thin upper lip.
Different treatment methods have been developed to decrease gingival display. Polo, Hwang et al., Suber et al., and Dinker et al. prevented the muscles responsible for gingival display from contracting by injecting botulinum toxin. Cairo et al., Batista et al., and Ribeiro et al., increased the crown length and as a consequence, decreased gingival display, by means of esthetic crown lengthening in patients with APE. Rosenblatt and Simon, Gupta et al., Dayakar et al., and Gaddale et al. removed a strip from the upper labial mucosa, which diminished upper lip mobility. Ishida et al., by means of myotomy, sectioned the upper lip elevator muscles and the labial frenulum, causing less lip mobility during smile.
Ribeiro-Júnior et al. recently demonstrated a conservative surgical technique employed to treat excessive gingival display. In their procedure, a modification of the technique proposed by Rosenblatt and Simon, two mucosa strips are removed bilaterally to the midline, preserving the maxillary labial frenulum, and apically suturing the mucosa. In a series of cases, Silva et al. demonstrated a mean gingival display reduction of 4.4 mm employing the aforementioned technique, achieving satisfactory esthetic outcomes for the patients.
Nevertheless, cases of the excessive gingival display with multiple etiologies require more than one technique to achieve desirable outcomes. Few case reports , have used the lip repositioning method associated with gingivectomy for the treatment of excessive gingival display. However, to the best of our knowledge, no study used the modified lip repositioning associated with gingivectomy and ostectomy to treat such cases.
Thus, the present report aims to demonstrate, for the first time, a case of excessive gingival display of multiple etiology, that is, APE and hypermobility of the upper lip, treated by means of modified lip repositioning associated with gingivectomy followed by flap elevation and ostectomy/osteoplasty.
| Case Report|| |
A 23-year-old female patient sought dental treatment complaining about short teeth and a significant amount of gingiva that appeared when she smiles. Patient was in good systemic and periodontal health, with normal upper lip length and harmonious facial thirds. After clinical examination, a 5 mm gingival display during smile was detected [Figure 1] and [Figure 2]. Gingival contour was irregular, with some teeth presenting disproportionate crown height/width ratio and quadratic shape [Figure 3]. Periodontal probing revealed that cementoenamel junction (CEJ) was localized 2 mm apically from the gingival margin and <1 mm coronally from the alveolar bone crest (ABC), suggesting a case of APE. Additionally, it was observed 10 mm of lip rising during smile, which suggested a case of hypermobility of the upper lip elevator muscle. After all data had been collected, the patient was diagnosed with excessive gingival display caused by APE associated with upper lip elevator muscle hypermobility.
|Figure 1: Extraoral initial front view showing 5 mm gingival display at smiling|
Click here to view
|Figure 2: Extraoral initial lateral view showing 5 mm gingival display at smiling|
Click here to view
|Figure 3: Intraoral initial view demonstrating irregular gingival contour and teeth with quadratic shape|
Click here to view
The treatment plan included modified lip repositioning technique  associated with esthetic crown lengthening. The surgeries were carried out in different moments due to the need for stabilizing the lip after the repositioning procedure.
Paracetamol 750 mg was prescribed for lip repositioning surgery as a preanesthetic medication. Extra-oral antisepsis was performed with 2% chlorhexidine solution, whereas intra-oral antisepsis was performed with 0.12% chlorhexidine rinse for 1 min. Local infiltration with 2% lidocaine associated with 1:100.000 epinephrine was used for anesthesia.
Lip repositioning surgery was initiated at the right side of the maxilla, with a partial-thickness horizontal incision, 1 mm coronally to the mucogingival line, from the midline to the first molar. Afterward, two vertical incisions were made at the end of the first incision, extending 10–12 mm apically. At last, a horizontal incision, parallel to the first one and linking the vertical incisions previously performed [Figure 4], was made. The outlined mucosa was removed, exposing the underlying connective tissue [Figure 5]. The procedure was repeated on the left side [Figure 6] and continuous interlocking sutures (polyglactin 910 5/0) were used to stabilize the mucosa to the gingiva [Figure 7].
Analgesic (paracetamol 750 mg qid) and 0.12% chlorhexidine rinse (twice daily for 1-week) were prescribed. Additionally, the patient was advised to apply ice packs, avoid mechanical trauma, consume only soft food, and keep lip movement to a minimum at smiling and talking for 2 weeks.
Patient was enrolled in a professional plaque control program, scheduled weekly for the first 4 weeks.
After 2 months [Figure 8], esthetic crown lengthening surgery was made by means of gingivectomy followed by flap elevation and ostectomy/osteoplasty. It initiated with the demarcation of CEJ position. Subsequently, an inverted bevel incision was made following CEJ anatomy, from tooth #15 to #25 [Figure 9], followed by intra-sulcular incision, removal of outlined marginal gingiva [Figure 10], and mucoperiosteal flap dissection [Figure 11]. Instruments (#2 Fedi and #36/37 Rhodes chisels) were used for ostectomy and osteoplasty aiming to leave a distance of 2 mm between CEJ and ABC [Figure 12]. To finish the procedure, mattress suture (poligalactina 910 5/0) was used for flap stabilization [Figure 13].
|Figure 9: Inverted bevel incision following cementoenamel junction anatomy from #15 to #25|
Click here to view
|Figure 12: Ostectomy and osteoplasty made with hand instruments leaving a distance of 2 mm between cementoenamel junction and alveolar bone crest|
Click here to view
|Figure 13: Flap repositioned and stabilized with vertical mattress sutures|
Click here to view
Analgesic (paracetamol 750 mg qid) and 0.12% chlorhexidine rinse (twice daily for 1-week) were prescribed. Suture was removed after 1-week.
Patient was enrolled in a professional plaque control program, scheduled weekly for the first 4 weeks, and then monthly until 7 months.
After 9 months of the lip repositioning surgery and 7 months of the esthetic crown lengthening procedure, a reduction in gingival display during smile and longer teeth were observed as well as esthetic improvements and patient's satisfaction was achieved [Figure 14].
|Figure 14: Postoperative view 9 months after lip repositioning and 7 months after esthetic crown lengthening|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
The present study reported a case of excessive gingival display with multiple etiologies causing esthetic concerns for the patient about her smile. The modified lip repositioning technique, proposed by Ribeiro-Junior et al., was used to treat the hypermobility of the upper lip. It is a more conservative technique that allows the labial frenulum to be preserved, thus, establishing greater tissue stability., Moreover, gingivectomy followed by flap elevation and ostectomy/osteoplasty was performed to increase crown length., The association of these two methods allowed satisfactory final outcomes in terms of patient satisfaction and decrease in the gingival display.
The literature reports other treatment methods for excessive gingival display due to hypermobility of the upper lip.
Botulinum toxin has yielded satisfactory results, given that it blocks the muscular activity. However, this technique has a transitory effect (6–7 months) and for this reason, the toxin must be reapplied periodically to maintain the desired outcome.,,,
In a more invasive way, the myotomy technique  also produces the desired results, however, it is a much more aggressive procedure with the irreversible outcome and great potential for morbidity.,
More recently, Storrer et al. proposed a new surgical technique with the combination of gingival recontouring and the traction and containment surgery of the elevator muscle of upper lip and wing of the nose. In a case report, the authors demonstrated good outcomes after 1-year with this technique that is less aggressive than myotomy.
Therefore, the modified lip repositioning technique  becomes a feasible alternative for patients who seek less gingival display during smile. The results are predictable, stable in the short term, and achieve patient's satisfaction. Some case reports ,,,,,, and case series , have demonstrated that the original  and the modified  techniques present consistent outcomes. However, there is no study in the literature showing more than 1-year of follow-up and a long-term stability still needs to be demonstrated.
The lip repositioning technique can also be used to treat patients with excessive gingival display for maxillary complete arch fixed implant-supported prostheses  and a reversible trial can be used, previous to the lip repositioning surgery, to preview the final outcome.,
The esthetic crown lengthening is a technique widely used to treat cases of APE,,, a condition that affect approximately 12% of the population  with a possible genetic correlation. Usually, it contemplates the use of gingivectomy or apically repositioned flap associated or not with ostectomy, depending on the type of APE.,
APE is classified into two types. Type 1 is characterized by short crowns and excessive amount of attached gingiva. Type 2 is associated with a normal gingival dimension. Moreover, APE can be sub-classified into Classes A and B. In Class A, the distance between ABC and CEJ is >1 mm, while in Class B this distance is shorter than 1 mm, not allowing a correct distance for biological width.
In the present case report, the patient presented a case of type 1B APE, that is, a great amount of attached gingiva and a short distance between ABC and CEJ. In this case, treatment plan must include gingivectomy and ostectomy/osteoplasty.,, If the ostectomy is suppressed, the return of gingiva to its original position, covering the tooth, can be expected.
Other authors reported the association of lip repositioning with gingivectomy alone for the treatment of excessive gingival display., However, to the best of our knowledge, the use of the modified lip repositioning technique associated with gingivectomy and ostectomy has not been previously reported for treatment of excessive gingival display.
If the ostectomy is done as an open flap surgery, the lip repositioning has to be done in a different moment, due to the need of an attached gingival tissue to stabilize the lip flap. On the other hand, the ostectomy can be made as a flapless surgery, in this case both techniques can be made at the same surgical procedure.
| Conclusion|| |
The use of modified lip repositioning technique associated with esthetic crown lengthening is an effective procedure for reducing gingival display caused by hypermobility of upper lip and APE. Understanding the etiology and possibilities of treatment is essential to define treatment protocol, mainly in cases of multiple etiologies.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Rosenblatt A, Simon Z. Lip repositioning for reduction of excessive gingival display: A clinical report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006;26:433-7.
Kaya B, Uyar R. Influence on smile attractiveness of the smile arc in conjunction with gingival display. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013;144:541-7.
Tjan AH, Miller GD, The JG. Some esthetic factors in a smile. J Prosthet Dent 1984;51:24-8.
Desai S, Upadhyay M, Nanda R. Dynamic smile analysis: Changes with age. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136:310.e1-10.
Silberberg N, Goldstein M, Smidt A. Excessive gingival display – Etiology, diagnosis, and treatment modalities. Quintessence Int 2009;40:809-18.
Polo M. Botulinum toxin type A (Botox) for the neuromuscular correction of excessive gingival display on smiling (gummy smile). Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133:195-203.
Hwang WS, Hur MS, Hu KS, Song WC, Koh KS, Baik HS, et al.
Surface anatomy of the lip elevator muscles for the treatment of gummy smile using botulinum toxin. Angle Orthod 2009;79:70-7.
Suber JS, Dinh TP, Prince MD, Smith PD. OnabotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of a “gummy smile”. Aesthet Surg J 2014;34:432-7.
Dinker S, Anitha A, Sorake A, Kumar K. Management of gummy smile with botulinum toxin type-A: A case report. J Int Oral Health 2014;6:111-5.
Cairo F, Graziani F, Franchi L, Defraia E, Pini Prato GP. Periodontal plastic surgery to improve aesthetics in patients with altered passive eruption/gummy smile: A case series study. Int J Dent 2012;2012:837658.
Batista EL Jr, Moreira CC, Batista FC, de Oliveira RR, Pereira KK. Altered passive eruption diagnosis and treatment: A cone beam computed tomography-based reappraisal of the condition. J Clin Periodontol 2012;39:1089-96.
Ribeiro FV, Hirata DY, Reis AF, Santos VR, Miranda TS, Faveri M, et al.
Open-flap versus flapless esthetic crown lengthening: 12-month clinical outcomes of a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Periodontol 2014;85:536-44.
Gupta KK, Srivastava A, Singhal R, Srivastava S. An innovative cosmetic technique called lip repositioning. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2010;14:266-9.
Dayakar MM, Gupta S, Shivananda H. Lip repositioning: An alternative cosmetic treatment for gummy smile. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2014;18:520-3.
Gaddale R, Desai SR, Mudda JA, Karthikeyan I. Lip repositioning. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2014;18:254-8.
Ishida LH, Ishida LC, Ishida J, Grynglas J, Alonso N, Ferreira MC. Myotomy of the levator labii superioris muscle and lip repositioning: A combined approach for the correction of gummy smile. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;126:1014-9.
Ribeiro-Júnior NV, Campos TV, Rodrigues JG, Martins TM, Silva CO. Treatment of excessive gingival display using a modified lip repositioning technique. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2013;33:309-14.
Silva CO, Ribeiro-Júnior NV, Campos TV, Rodrigues JG, Tatakis DN. Excessive gingival display: Treatment by a modified lip repositioning technique. J Clin Periodontol 2013;40:260-5.
Gabric Panduric D, Blaškovic M, Brozovic J, Sušic M. Surgical treatment of excessive gingival display using lip repositioning technique and laser gingivectomy as an alternative to orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014;72:404.e1-11.
Storrer CL, Valverde FK, Santos FR, Deliberador TM. Treatment of gummy smile: Gingival recontouring with the containment of the elevator muscle of the upper lip and wing of nose. A surgery innovation technique. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2014;18:656-60.
Humayun N, Kolhatkar S, Souiyas J, Bhola M. Mucosal coronally positioned flap for the management of excessive gingival display in the presence of hypermobility of the upper lip and vertical maxillary excess: A case report. J Periodontol 2010;81:1858-63.
Sheth T, Shah S, Shah M, Shah E. Lip reposition surgery: A new call in periodontics. Contemp Clin Dent 2013;4:378-81.
Grover HS, Gupta A, Luthra S. Lip repositioning surgery: A pioneering technique for perio-esthetics. Contemp Clin Dent 2014;5:142-5.
Jananni M, Sivaramakrishnan M, Libby TJ. Surgical correction of excessive gingival display in class I vertical maxillary excess: Mucosal strip technique. J Nat Sci Biol Med 2014;5:494-8.
Ozturan S, Ay E, Sagir S. Case series of laser-assisted treatment of excessive gingival display: An alternative treatment. Photomed Laser Surg 2014;32:517-23.
Bidra AS, Agar JR, Parel SM. Management of patients with excessive gingival display for maxillary complete arch fixed implant-supported prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 2012;108:324-31.
Jacobs PJ, Jacobs BP. Lip repositioning with reversible trial for the management of excessive gingival display: A case series. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2013;33:169-75.
Volchansky A, Cleaton-Jones PE. Delayed passive eruption. A predisposing factor to Vincent's infection? J Dent Assoc S Afr 1974;29:291-4.
Rossi R, Brunelli G, Piras V, Pilloni A. Altered passive eruption and familial trait: A preliminary investigation. Int J Dent 2014;2014:874092.
Coslet JG, Vanarsdall R, Weisgold A. Diagnosis and classification of delayed passive eruption of the dentogingival junction in the adult. Alpha Omegan 1977;70:24-8.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7], [Figure 8], [Figure 9], [Figure 10], [Figure 11], [Figure 12], [Figure 13], [Figure 14]