Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology
Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology
Home | About JISP | Search | Accepted articles | Online Early | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | SubmissionSubscribeLogin 
Users Online: 876  Home Print this page Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font sizeWide layoutNarrow layoutFull screen layout


 
   Table of Contents    
CASE REPORT
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 19  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 449-453  

Root amputation and perio-esthetics in salvaging a premolar


Department of Periodontics, Kothiwal Dental College and Research Centre, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India

Date of Submission05-Feb-2014
Date of Acceptance09-Feb-2015
Date of Web Publication11-Aug-2015

Correspondence Address:
Swati Agarwal
Department of Periodontics, Kothiwal Dental College and Research Centre, Mora Mustaqueem, Kanth Road, Moradabad - 244 001, Uttar Pradesh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0972-124X.153473

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

A 32-year-old patient with complete denudation of buccal root of tooth no. 14 was referred from the Department of Oral Surgery for opinion, as he was not willing for extraction. Patient's persistent urge to save the tooth, put forth a challenge, which motivated us to tweak the established techniques. The unusual presentation of the case and unexpected par-operative condition of the surgical site required out-of-box measures to deal with the situation. Though, the tooth no. 14 was having Grade-I mobility, it was endodontically treated, buccal root was resected, osseous graft was applied over the deficient ridge area and lateral pedicle flap was displaced over the short root-trunk area to cover the surgical site. To our astonishment, the tooth survived, mobility was reduced and complete coverage with soft-tissue was observed. Uneventful healing with stable gingival margin was observed at 3-month interval, which remained stationary at 1-year follow-up.

Keywords: Denudation, root-resection, regeneration, laterally displaced flap, root-trunk


How to cite this article:
Agarwal S, Saxena A, Chaubey KK, Agarwal M. Root amputation and perio-esthetics in salvaging a premolar. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2015;19:449-53

How to cite this URL:
Agarwal S, Saxena A, Chaubey KK, Agarwal M. Root amputation and perio-esthetics in salvaging a premolar. J Indian Soc Periodontol [serial online] 2015 [cited 2019 Jul 17];19:449-53. Available from: http://www.jisponline.com/text.asp?2015/19/4/449/153473


   Introduction Top


Gingival recession is an intriguing and complex phenomenon and is defined as exposure of the root surface due to the displacement of the gingival margin apical to the cemento-enamel-junction. Its etiology is multifactorial like, plaque-induced inflammation, calculus, iatrogenic restorations, trauma from improper oral hygiene practices, tooth malpositions, high frenum, and uncontrolled orthodontic movements. [1] Gingival recession is also a common outcome of the therapies delivered to treat periodontal disease. [2]

Even though, gingival recession may occur without any symptoms it can give rise to patient's concern about loss of the tooth, poor esthetics, root caries, dentine hypersensitivity and inability to perform oral hygiene procedures. To meet the increased expectation of patients, newer treatment strategies have evolved to salvage even the most dilapidated tooth by perio-plastic surgery and interdisciplinary approach involving endodontics. In premolars, if there is simultaneous furcation involvement, which has the worst prognosis, management becomes a challenge. The furcation can be eliminated by root-resection, but coverage of the remaining root requires perioplastic-surgery with attempts for regeneration. Periodontal-plastic surgery is one of the recent emerging surgical modality in periodontics to save a tooth. It provides us with an excellent opportunity to restore the form, function and esthetics of an individual in even very challenging circumstances. The pedicle graft was the first periodontal plastic surgical procedure proposed in 1956 for root coverage. [3] Application of pedicle grafts is based on the simple concept of moving donor tissue laterally to cover an adjacent defect. It provides sufficient esthetic result. At first it was described as the "lateral sliding flap." The procedure was then modified and named as the laterally positioned flap. The "oblique rotational flap", the "rotation flap", and the "transpositioned flap" are modifications in incision design. All these procedures have a common requirement of adequate width of attached gingiva prior to root coverage procedures. [4]

This article describes a case report, in which tangible results have been achieved using combined interdisciplinary approach involving sophisticated perio-plastic surgical techniques, root-resection, and endodontics to salvage a maxillary first premolar recession defect with furcation involvement.


   Case Report Top


A 32-year-old male patient complaint of bleeding and receding gums throughout the mouth and recurrent pain with root exposure in relation to upper right first premolar since last 8-9 months [Figure 1]. History revealed - vigorous horizontal scrubbing brushing method, progressive apical migration of the marginal gingiva in no. 14. On clinical examination generalized recession and mild to moderate probing pocket depths (3-5 mm) could be appreciated. The tooth no. 14 exhibited complete exposure of the buccal root, loss of vitality (upon electric pulp test), Grade III furcation involvement and Grade I mobility.
Figure 1: Preoperative image showing denuded root surface of no. 14

Click here to view


Management

An endo-perio inter-disciplinary treatment approach was planned. Phase I therapy comprised of scaling and root planning, rolling method of brushing, and occlusal corrections, followed by endodontic treatment, resection of buccal root and perio-plastic surgery for coverage of partially visible palatal root.

Obviously, the affected tooth had a completely denuded and prominent buccal root, which could hinder the treatment outcome. Hence, the buccal root was resected using a tapered fissure bur at the furcation level obliquely [Figure 2] and [Figure 3]. The obturated gutta-percha was visible on resected root-end near the furcation. 2 mm of gutta-percha was removed from the cut end, and it was sealed with a layer of glass-ionomer-cement (GIC) [Figure 4]. Almost two-third of the buccal aspect of the palatal root was visible. Its apical-third and palatal aspect were still embedded within bone and probably this was the reason for Grade-I mobility despite extensive bone-loss. Subsequently, lateral pedicle flap from the adjacent premolar, along with bone graft, was planned. De-epithelization of the mesial papilla of no. 14 was done using a no. 15 blade and recipient bed were prepared. After trans-gingival probing over buccal attached gingiva to rule out dehiscence/fenestration, sub-marginal incision was made leaving 2 mm of the gingival margin in the second premolar using a no. 11 blade [Figure 5]. Vertical incision along the distal line angle of the second premolar was then taken taking into consideration that the width of reflected flap was one and a half times wider than that of the recession. Full thickness flap was than raised up to mucogingival junction, followed by raising of partial thickness flap beyond the mucogingival junction to achieve coverage by flap without tension [Figure 6]. Synthetic bone graft, RTR (Septodont, 94107 Saint-Maur-des-Fosses Cedex, France) was placed, to fill the depression after root-resection [Figure 7]. Flap was than displaced laterally and carefully stabilized with interrupted and stabilizing nonresorbable sutures [Ethicon 5-0; Johnson and Johnson, India.] [Figure 8].
Figure 2: Root resection at furcation area

Click here to view
Figure 3: Exposed gutta-percha after root resection

Click here to view
Figure 4: Exposed gutta-percha sealed with a layer of GIC

Click here to view
Figure 5: Sub-marginal incision taken at donor site

Click here to view
Figure 6: Full thickness flap raised at donor site

Click here to view
Figure 7: Bone graft placed

Click here to view
Figure 8: Flap displaced laterally and sutured

Click here to view


Periodontal dressing was given over aluminium-foil on the site. The patient was discharged with postoperative instructions and medications (Amoxicillin 500 mg t.d.s for 5 days and paracetamol 625 mg b.d. for 3 days after the consultation with his treating physician), and chlorhexidine mouth-wash twice daily for 10 days. The patient was recalled after 10 days for suture removal and check-up [Figure 9]. There was no postoperative complication and healing was satisfactory. The defect created at the donor site was healing by secondary intention. The patient was instructed to use a soft toothbrush. He was monitored on a weekly schedule postoperatively, to ensure good oral hygiene of the surgical area. The re-evaluation of this area at 3-month follow-up showed no relapse or recession [Figure 10]. The healing was uneventful. The cervical abrasion on the buccal surface was restored with light cure composite resin. One year follow-up showed no recession and gingival margin appeared stable [Figure 11].
Figure 9: Postoperative 10 days

Click here to view
Figure 10: Postoperative 3 months

Click here to view
Figure 11: Postoperative 1 year

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


Gingival recessions may occur without any symptoms, but may give rise to the patient concern for poor esthetics, hypersensitivity, inability to perform oral hygiene procedures, and tooth-loss. The initial step was correction of the etiological factors. With the advent of newer periodontal-plastic surgical procedures, numerous techniques can be applied for the treatment of denuded roots and other mucogingival defects, but it is often difficult to anticipate the success rate of root coverage procedures since coverage depends on several factors, including the type and location of the recession and the technique used. The selection of the surgical technique also depends on several factors, including the anatomy of the defect site, size of the recession defect, the presence or absence of keratinized tissue adjacent to the defect, the width and height of the interdental soft tissue, and the depth of the vestibule or the presence of frenula. [5]

In the present case vigorous brushing technique, assumed to be the main etiology for recession, was corrected first. The loss of the proximal interdental tissue and prominence of root are important factors, which affect the successful outcome of the treatment. Furcation aids in progression of the disease and here, there was early furcation involvement due to short root trunk. Moreover, in premolars the opening of furcation is on the mesial and distal aspect, which deteriorates the prognosis and makes coverage difficult. Hence, the prominent buccal root was completely resected and the prominence of the root-trunk was also reduced. The tooth was having Grade I mobility only, because of sound bone around palatal root. The relatively coronal level of proximal tissue favored the outcome. The GIC, used to seal the cut end of the root has been found to be bio-compatible, over which attachment of tissues have been found. Hence, almost complete recovery could be achieved.

Almost all the indications and favorable conditions for laterally positioned flap, as described above were available in the present case except 2 mm of gingival recession on tooth no. 15. Due to this, there could be a possibility of postoperative gingival recession at donor site tooth no. 15 and to prevent this, sub marginal incision was performed. Furthermore, it was having favorable 4 mm of attached gingiva, which favored selection of this design of the flap. Usually, premolars have a minimum width of attached gingiva ranging between 1.5 and 2.5 mm. However, here there was sufficient width, length, and thickness of keratinized tissue adjacent to the area of gingival recession. It is well stated that a better root coverage outcomes can only be achieved in cases with adequate height and width of adjacent keratinized tissue. [6]

The advantages of pedicle graft are that predictable correction of gingival recession is possible as the graft has an uninterrupted blood supply from its base, and that postoperative discomfort is usually minor because no second surgery or another surgical site is involved. Also, the color of the graft matches the adjacent gingiva so, this technique provides good esthetics. Shrinkage of the displaced flap has been observed which has been compensated by taking one and a half times wider flap design and placement of margin almost 2 mm coronal to cemento-enamel-junction (CEJ). Bone graft was placed in order to provide scaffold and compensate the depression in the ridge due to root-resection.

In a propitious situation, the laterally positioned flap has been widely used to cover Miller Class-I and Class-II recession defects. [7] In this type of flap operations, the flap remains attached at their base and hence that they retain their own blood supply during their transfer to a new location. Contraindications include if the donor site lacks sufficient attached gingiva or if the donor site has a fenestration or dehiscence of its supporting bone, that were absent in this case. Stability and dimension of the laterally positioned flap (the wider the pedicle, the greater the blood supply to the marginal portion of the flap) are critical for accomplishing root coverage. The tissue thickness of the flap is an important aspect on the root coverage predictability and an improvement in esthetic outcome. [8] Precise determination of the location of the CEJ and mucogingival junction prior to surgery and precise placement of incisions are necessary in order to achieve optimum esthetics. [9] Studies have shown that with a rigid case selection the laterally positioned flap is an effective method in treating isolated gingival recession. [10] Root-resection has been implied to eliminate the furcation which favored the treatment.

In this case, a successful management of denuded buccal root of a maxillary first premolar was possible with advanced perio-plastic surgical procedures providing esthetic satisfaction and salvaging the tooth that was the prime concern of the patient. Clinical results 1-year postoperatively were conducive with no recession. Thus, it can be construed that with diligent design, perio-plastic surgery can be implied to revamp the esthetics as well as banish the disease, even in the furcationally involved premolar.


   Conclusion Top


Esthetic surgery is performed to reshape the affected structures in order to ameliorate the patient's appearance. The better understanding of the tissue behavior and broader treatment modalities help in discovering cures for situations, which were otherwise deemed to be impossible to treat before. With the interdisciplinary treatment approach and perio-plastic surgery the tooth which are usually extracted can now be saved.

 
   References Top

1.
Tugnait A, Clerehugh V. Gingival recession-its significance and management. J Dent 2001;29:381-94.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Zucchelli G, Clauser C, De Sanctis M, Calandriello M. Mucogingival versus guided tissue regeneration procedures in the treatment of deep recession type defects. J Periodontol 1998;69:138-45.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Grupe HE, Warren RF. Repair of gingival defects by sliding flap operation. J Periodontol 1956;27:92-5.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Wade AB. Vestibular deepening by the technique of Edlan and Mejchar. J Periodontal Res 1969;4:300-13.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    
5.
Zucchelli G, Testori T, De Sanctis M. Clinical and anatomical factors limiting treatment outcomes of gingival recession: A new method to predetermine the line of root coverage. J Periodontol 2006;77:714-21.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Verma PK, Srivastava R, Chaturvedi TP, Gupta KK. Root coverage with bridge flap. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2013;17:120-3.  Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
7.
Miller PD Jr. A classification of marginal tissue recession. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1985;18:44453.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Kerner S, Sarfati A, Katsahian S, Jaumet V, Micheau C, Mora F, et al. Qualitative cosmetic evaluation after root-coverage procedures. J Periodontol 2009;80:41-7.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Maynard JG Jr, Wilson RD. Physiologic dimensions of the periodontium significant to the restorative dentist. J Periodontol 1979;50:170-4.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]    
10.
Jagannathachary S, Prakash S. Coronally positioned flap with or without acellular dermal matrix graft in the treatment of class II gingival recession defects: A randomized controlled clinical study. Contemp Clin Dent 2010;1:73-8.  Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7], [Figure 8], [Figure 9], [Figure 10], [Figure 11]



 

Top
   
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
   Case Report
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2334    
    Printed34    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded312    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal